Chicago Fire Investigating Harassment Charges At Fire Academy

The Chicago Fire Department is investigating claims by African American female firefighter-recruits that dog feces was smeared on a sweatshirt and a chair in their changing area at the fire academy. Their attorney claims the feces was someone’s way of saying “We don’t want you here.”

The feces was discovered last week in a changing room used by 13 female African-American firefighter candidates, all of whom are in their 40s and 50s. The candidates applied to the Chicago Fire Department 20 years ago, but were rejected. Following the settlement of two class action lawsuits alleging race and gender discrimination, the 13 women were admitted to the fire academy.

An attorney representing the candidates, Marni Willenson, said “It’s an unambiguous message: “We don’t want you here.” Whoever did this is saying, “We don’t want you here.'”

 

About Curt Varone

Curt Varone has over 45 years of fire service experience and 35 as a practicing attorney licensed in both Rhode Island and Maine. His background includes 29 years as a career firefighter in Providence (retiring as a Deputy Assistant Chief), as well as volunteer and paid on call experience. He is the author of two books: Legal Considerations for Fire and Emergency Services, (2006, 2nd ed. 2011, 3rd ed. 2014, 4th ed. 2022) and Fire Officer's Legal Handbook (2007), and is a contributing editor for Firehouse Magazine writing the Fire Law column.
x

Check Also

Rochester Firefighter Claims Domestic Violence and Gender Discrimination

A Rochester firefighter who claims to have been the victim of domestic violence and sexual harassment at work, has filed suit against the City of Rochester. The firefighter, identified as Jane Doe, claims that the city failed to protect her from domestic violence as required by state law and city policy, and that she was sexually harassed by coworkers at work.

Kentucky Court Concludes Board Member Testifying and Voting Violates Due Process

A Kentucky court has concluded that a fire district board member who served as an adverse witness against an accused firefighter in a disciplinary proceeding, violated the firefighter’s due process by participating in deliberations and the adjudication decision.