Pittsburgh Reaches Agreement With Union on Residency

Posted by: Curt Varone May 10, 2022 0

The City of Pittsburgh and Pittsburgh Firefighters IAFF Local 1 have reached a compromise on ending a residency requirement for firefighters. The residency requirement was incorporated into the city charter in 2013 for firefighters and police officers.

Pittsburgh’s police union challenged the charter amendment contending it illegally removed an otherwise bargainable subject from the collective bargaining process. In 2017, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed, ruling the charter amendment was unenforceable.

The firefighters and the city submitted the residency issue to a neutral arbitrator, who ordered the city to stop enforcing the residency requirement. That prompted the city to appeal the arbitrator’s ruling to court.

The compromise resolves the appeal by allowing firefighter to live outside city limits, but requires them to remain within a 60 minute drive of the City-County Building.

About Curt Varone

Curt Varone has over 45 years of fire service experience and 35 as a practicing attorney licensed in both Rhode Island and Maine. His background includes 29 years as a career firefighter in Providence (retiring as a Deputy Assistant Chief), as well as volunteer and paid on call experience. He is the author of two books: Legal Considerations for Fire and Emergency Services, (2006, 2nd ed. 2011, 3rd ed. 2014, 4th ed. 2022) and Fire Officer's Legal Handbook (2007), and is a contributing editor for Firehouse Magazine writing the Fire Law column.
© Copyright 2017, All Rights Reserved. | FireLawBlog.com & Curt Varone | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
x

Check Also

Discipline For Complaining to Union Leads to Federal Suit

A Charleston firefighter who was transferred after he complained to his union about unsafe station conditions, has filed suit along with IAFF Local 61 alleging the discipline violated the First Amendment

NY Appellate Division Upholds FDNY Vaccine Mandate

The Appellate Division of the NY Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the NY City Board of Collective Bargaining concluding that the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for members of IAFF Local 94, was not grievable as it related to the placement of non-compliant members on leave without pay. Local 94 sought to grieve the city’s implementation of the vaccine mandate.