Denver Firefighters Want To Negotiate Over Disciplinary Matrix

Denver Firefighters, IAFF Local 858, have filed suit seeking to block the unilateral implementation of a disciplinary matrix.

Local 858 was in court yesterday seeking a court order to force the city to negotiate the disciplinary matrix because it is a mandatory subject for collective bargaining. The city claims the matrix is a management prerogative outside the scope of collective bargaining because discipline is addressed in the city charter.

A ruling is expected later this month.

What is a disciplinary matrix? It is a set of guidelines specifying designated penalties for designated rule violations. The purpose of a matrix is in theory a valid one: ensure that similarly situated employees receive similar penalties for the same infraction.

We have all seen situations where firefighter A gets a reprimand and Firefighter B gets suspended for essentially the same conduct. In much the same way that sentencing guidelines help ensure that all criminal defendants receive the same treatment in court, disciplinary matrixes are intended to level the playing field in the workplace without regard to race, gender, friendship or political affiliation.

The problem is treating people the same is not the same as treating people fairly. Critics of disciplinary matrixes cite cases where treating two employees who are not similarly situated the same is not right. For example under many disciplinary matrixes, a brand new employee who is late for work would be treated the same as a thirty year veteran with a previously untarnished record.

Disciplinary matrixes have also been criticized as tying the hands of fire department leadership in cases where an employee has a known problem (substance abuse, anger management, etc.) in terms of forcing that employee to get the help he or she needs.

Some of the criticisms of disciplinary matrixes can be resolved up front by building in a degree of flexibility to address unique situations. However, there remains an inherent conflict between being consistent from individual to individual, and being fair to each individual based on that person’s situation.





About Curt Varone

Curt Varone has over 40 years of fire service experience and 30 as a practicing attorney licensed in both Rhode Island and Maine. His background includes 29 years as a career firefighter in Providence (retiring as a Deputy Assistant Chief), as well as volunteer and paid on call experience. He is the author of two books: Legal Considerations for Fire and Emergency Services, (2006, 2nd ed. 2011, 3rd ed. 2014) and Fire Officer's Legal Handbook (2007), and is a contributing editor for Firehouse Magazine writing the Fire Law column.

Check Also

Third Circuit Refuses to Block Township’s Decision to Eliminate PA Fire Department

The 3rd Circuit has refused to block a Pennsylvania township from eliminating one of its two volunteer fire companies. The Sassamansville Fire Co. No. 1 brought the action after New Hanover Township voted to eliminate it, claiming a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

DC Firefighter-EMTs File Class Action Suit Over Pension

Five dual function EMT-firefighters with the District of Columbia Fire and Emergency Medical Services have filed a class action lawsuit alleging that the city has reneged on pension-related promises. The complaint seeks to require the city to comply with its contractual and statutory pension obligations, as well alleging the city was motivated in denying them their benefits due to their race and gender.