Origins of the 7K Firefighter Overtime Exemption

Today’s burning question: I was wondering if you knew the origin of the firefighter exemption from the 40-hour work week? It seems to me that firefighters are treated unfairly compared to virtually any other profession in the US by having to work those extra hours. Has there ever been a push to remove that exemption?

Answer: The law you are referring to is the Fair Labor Standards Act, and more specifically 29 USC 207k within the act. The FLSA was enacted by Congress in 1938. At the time, it did not apply to state and local governments. Thus, there was no need for special regulations to address the hours worked by firefighters and police officers, who typically worked longer hours than most other employees.

In 1974 the FLSA was amended to apply to state and local governments for the first time. At that time, Congress enacted the 207k exemption (usually referred to as 7k exemption) to allow firefighters (who commonly worked an average of 48-56 hours a week) and police officers (many of whom worked 45-48 hour schedules) to continue working those hours with minimal impact to taxpayers. In addition, to address the inherent variation in weekly hours that firefighters and police officers had due to their rotating schedules, the 7k exemption extended the 7 day work week applicable to everyone else, to a work period that could be between 7 and 28 days long.

In 1976, the US Supreme Court struck down the application of the FLSA to state and local government for core governmental activities, including police and firefighters, as being an unconstitutional intrusion on state’s rights. National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833 (1976). Nine years later, the US Supreme Court revisited the Usery decision in Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985). This time the Supreme Court reversed course, ruling that Congress could apply the FLSA to state and local governments. It was at that point that the 7k exemption truly went into effect.

I am not aware of any serious effort to lower the maximum hours for firefighters from 53 per week (212 in 28 days), despite the grumblings of firefighters. Any change to the 7k requirement would have to come from Congress, although state legislatures could enact laws to reduce the maximum hours for firefighters within their state. My sense is there is a genuine concern that such a change would have a devastating impact on staffing levels in many fire departments.

About Curt Varone

Curt Varone has over 40 years of fire service experience and 30 as a practicing attorney licensed in both Rhode Island and Maine. His background includes 29 years as a career firefighter in Providence (retiring as a Deputy Assistant Chief), as well as volunteer and paid on call experience. He is the author of two books: Legal Considerations for Fire and Emergency Services, (2006, 2nd ed. 2011, 3rd ed. 2014) and Fire Officer's Legal Handbook (2007), and is a contributing editor for Firehouse Magazine writing the Fire Law column.

Check Also

Jury Awards $3.8 Million to Tucson Firefighter Over Nursing Mothers Rights

A federal court jury in Arizona has awarded a Tucson firefighter $3.8 million in damages for the department’s failure to accommodate her needs as a nursing mother. Carrie Clark filed suit in 2014 alleging her fire station did not accommodate her need to express breast milk, and that she was retaliated against once her complaints became known.

Burning Question on Retaliation and the FLSA

Today’s burning question: My fire department has been miscalculating our overtime pay, so we filed suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The fire department responded by requiring a doctor’s note for all sick leave of two consecutive days or more. Isn’t that retaliation? Answer: Retaliation is a question of fact, but if the fire department did alter your working conditions the department could be facing additional damages for retaliation.