administration-leadershipCivil SuitLabor LawMunicipal LiabilityPoliticsWrongful terminationYou Can't Make This Stuff Up
Fire Marshal Blames Union and Mayor For His Removal
Former Los Angeles Fire Marshal John Vidovich has filed a lawsuit accusing Mayor Eric Garcetti and IAFF Local 112, the United Firefighters of Los Angeles City (UFLAC) of conspiring to remove him as fire marshal.
The suit filed yesterday in Los Angeles County Superior Court claims the union was upset with Chief Vidovich’s reforms of the LA fire prevention division, and sought his removal. In August, 2016 he was removed as fire marshal and reassigned to the Mayor’s Office. According to the complaint:
- Plaintiffs ouster was in direct retaliation for Plaintiffs reporting of illegal and fraudulent acts he discovered in his job as Fire Marshal that were being committed by certain members of the City’s Fire Protection Bureau
- the UNION began a public relations campaign that falsely painted Plaintiff as an incompetent leader who put firefighters and the public at risk.
- the same individuals whose misconduct Plaintiff had observed and reported, led the campaign to falsely impugn the reputation and integrity of Plaintiff.
- As part of this campaign, the UNION also began feeding the press false stories about Plaintiff.
- Plaintiff … alleges, that in exchange for Mayor Garcetti’s agreement to ratify the UNION’s retaliation against Plaintiff by removing him from his job as Fire Marshal, the UNION agreed to endorse the Mayor for re-election in March 2017, and further agreed to contribute to his re-election campaign.
The 19-page 92-paragraph complaint alleges 7 counts:
- Violations of Labor Code § 1102.5
- Aiding and Abetting Violations of Labor Code § 1102.5
- Violations of the Private Attorneys General Act Labor Code §2698 et seq.
- Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
- Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage
- Negligent Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage
- Civil Conspiracy
It names the City of Los Angeles and Local 112 as defendants.
Here is a copy of the complaint: vidovich-v-los-angeles
The lawsuit suggest the Fire Marshal’s removal was primarily because ‘he’ discovered and reported these possible instances of misconduct of a few inspectors, and instituted change that so upset the approx 100 inspectors of the bureau that they in turn influenced a 3K+ member firefighter union to oust the FM.
As in any major entity, there will always be a few unethical members who take advantage of the system. The FM has claimed he reported such activities of a member to the Fire Chief who did nothing. Isn’t it possible the Mayor and Fire Chief have ongoing investigations on this member and others that preclude them from speaking openly about it? There are limitations concerning disclosures of active investigations.
I’m hoping our City doesn’t settle this $5M law suit; we can’t afford it. Perhaps some investigative reporting could help the city and it’s residents by disclosing other issues that could have been the real reason for his removal? Are you aware of the possible loss of over $1M in revenue due to his mismanagement of a fee supported unit? The Fire Prevention Bureau is not a Fortune 500 company so $1M of tax payer money is A LOT. Wouldn’t your readers agree mismanagement resulting in the the loss of over $1M in revenue alone gives the Mayor and Fire Chief grounds for removing the Fire Marshal from his position?
This is just one example of an issue your readers might not be privy to that could have been the primary reason for the Fire Marshal’s removal.