Bank Sues WV Fire Department For Nonpayment on Apparatus Lease

Posted by: Curt Varone April 18, 2014 0

A volunteer fire company in West Virginia is being sued by a local bank for defaulting on payments for a new 3,000 gallon tanker.

Last August, the Wharncliffe Volunteer Fire Department Inc. purchased a new tanker under a lease-purchase agreement with Country Roads Leasing. The lease agreement was then assigned to Summit Community Bank, who claims the fire company has made no payments and owes it $52,206 plus interest.

The suit was filed March 26, 2014 in Hardy County Circuit Court. No word on whether the bank will be moving to repossess the tanker.

More on the story.

About Curt Varone

Curt Varone has over 45 years of fire service experience and 35 as a practicing attorney licensed in both Rhode Island and Maine. His background includes 29 years as a career firefighter in Providence (retiring as a Deputy Assistant Chief), as well as volunteer and paid on call experience. He is the author of two books: Legal Considerations for Fire and Emergency Services, (2006, 2nd ed. 2011, 3rd ed. 2014, 4th ed. 2022) and Fire Officer's Legal Handbook (2007), and is a contributing editor for Firehouse Magazine writing the Fire Law column.
© Copyright 2017, All Rights Reserved. | FireLawBlog.com & Curt Varone | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
x

Check Also

West Virginia Court Affirms Dismissal of Suit Over Carbon Monoxide Exposure

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia has affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by a family who claimed that 911 operators mishandled carbon monoxide incident resulting in serious injuries. The suit was brought by three members of the Marchant family over an incident that occurred in February 2018.

Fourth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Free Speech Lawsuit by Terminated Lynchburg Fire Captain

The U.S. Fourth Circuit has upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by a former Lynchburg, VA fire captain who claimed he was wrongfully terminated for posting anti-transgender content on social media. The high-profile case involved allegations of 1st Amendment violations, religious discrimination, and political retaliation.