Montana City Challenges BCs Being in Firefighters Union

The City of Bozeman is challenging a ruling of the Montana Board of Personnel Appeals that three new battalion chiefs should be included within IAFF Local 613. The ruling issued last June concluded that all positions below the rank of deputy chief should remain within the bargaining unit.

The battalion chief positions were created in 2007 but not actually filled until 2013. The collective bargaining agreement essentially provides that all personnel below deputy chief should be in Local 613, although some changes in titles over the years cast some doubt.

In June of 2013, the City of Bozeman petitioned the Board of Personnel Appeals to exclude the three newly created battalion chief positions from Local 613 “because it perceived these positions to be either supervisory, management, or confidential positions that could not properly be included in the bargaining unit.”

According to the hearing officer’s opinion:

  • There is no evidence that battalion chiefs have the authority to hire, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, or reward other employees.
  • There are no actual examples of battalion chiefs having any access to confidential labor relations information in the normal course of employment.
  • To date, there are no examples of battalion chiefs participating in any manner as a City representative or as part of the City’s bargaining team in negotiations with Local 613.
  • When the City created the three battalion chief positions, the union, which supported the creation of the positions, took a vote on whether or not to retain the three positions in the bargaining unit. Of the 38 members in the unit, 30 voted in favor of keeping the three battalion chief positions in the unit, one member indicated he was neutral on the idea, and the remaining seven members did not respond. No member voted in favor of removing the three positions from the unit.
  • Keeping all positions except the chief and deputy in chief in the bargaining unit is consistent with the party’s historical practices and has not created an actual substantial conflict between management and the bargaining unit. Therefore, there is no basis to remove the positions from the unit, even if they are found to wield supervisory or management authority.

The full board adopted the hearing officer’s ruling on June 30, 2014, from which the city appealed to Gallatin County District Court.

Here is a copy of the MBPA ruling: cbdec1821_2013

According to the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, Bozeman is not alone in keeping BCs in the bargaining unit. Battalion chiefs in Billings, Missoula and Great Falls are in the firefighters union. Here is more on the appeal.

About Curt Varone

Curt Varone has over 45 years of fire service experience and 35 as a practicing attorney licensed in both Rhode Island and Maine. His background includes 29 years as a career firefighter in Providence (retiring as a Deputy Assistant Chief), as well as volunteer and paid on call experience. He is the author of two books: Legal Considerations for Fire and Emergency Services, (2006, 2nd ed. 2011, 3rd ed. 2014, 4th ed. 2022) and Fire Officer's Legal Handbook (2007), and is a contributing editor for Firehouse Magazine writing the Fire Law column.
x

Check Also

Court Refuses to Dismiss Due Process Demotion Case

A Wisconsin fire captain who was demoted in 2021 when the city reorganized its promotional process, got a mixed decision in his federal court lawsuit. Richard Haffner claims that Fire Chief Joshua Bell, the City of New Richmond, and the City’s Police and Fire Commission violated his due process rights by removing him as a captain without cause or a hearing.

UK Parliament Questions Fire Service Leader on Institutional Racism Claim

As have many fire departments in the UK and Canada recently, the Dorset and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Authority has been in the news relative to allegations of institutional racism and sexism. However, when questioned by Lee Anderson, a member of parliament, the chair of the Authority, Rebecca Knox, was unable to answer some relatively simple questions about the decision to label her organization “institutionally racist.”