Missouri Suit Claims Firefighter’s Termination Was Due To Union Organizing Activities

A Missouri fire protection district and its fire chief are facing a suit that claims they terminated a firefighter because she was trying to organize a union.

Amber Rounseville is suing the Ebenezer Fire Protection District and Fire Chief Nelson Prewitt alleging violations of the Missouri Constitution, state collective bargaining laws, and the First Amendment’s freedom of association clause. She was terminated on April 17, 2014 following her efforts to organize firefighters.

According to the complaint, a battalion chief, Wilson Brahm, was the first to reach out to the IAFF for help with organizing Ebenezer’s personnel back in 2012.

  • Battalion Chief Brahm … was subsequently shunned by the Chief for doing so. Upon information and belief, Battalion Chief Brahm resigned from his employment with the District due to the anti-union sentiment of Chief Nelson.
  • During this same time frame, Chief Nelson told Plaintiff, “I’m not going to let the union come into my fire department. I’ve spent all these years building this department, I’m not going to let the union come in here and take over.”
  • Chief Nelson… made the following derogatory comments regarding the Union:
    • Chief Nelson stated that the Union promoted drinking;
    • Chief Nelson stated that if the employees of the District were to join the Union, there would likely be pay cuts for the employees;
    • Chief Nelson’s comments regarding unions in general indicated his strong dislike and opposition to employee unions.
  • Upon the promotion of [an] unqualified individual to the position of Assistant Chief [Feb/Mar, 2014], Plaintiff began polling the District’s employees to determine the level of interest in joining the Union.
  • Upon information and belief, Chief Nelson [became] aware Plaintiff was attempting to discern the level of employee interest in joining the Union, and believed her to be a spokesperson for the Union.
  • On or about April 17, 2014, while Plaintiff was on duty, Chief Nelson handed her a letter from the Board of Directors and stated that the District was terminating her employment.
  • The letter did not provide any reasons for Plaintiff’s termination.
  • When Plaintiff asked Chief Nelson why she was being terminated, he told her he did not need to provide her with a reason, and refused to provide her with a reason.

Rounselville initially filed suit in state court in the 31st Judicial Circuit in Green County. Last week, attorneys for the Ebenezer FPD and Chief Prewitt removed the case to US District Court for the Western District of Missouri. (Note the complaint refers to Chief Prewitt as Chief Nelson is several places).

Here is a copy of the state court complaint: Rounsenville v Ebenezer

Here is the removal notice: Rounsenville Removal

About Curt Varone

Curt Varone has over 45 years of fire service experience and 35 as a practicing attorney licensed in both Rhode Island and Maine. His background includes 29 years as a career firefighter in Providence (retiring as a Deputy Assistant Chief), as well as volunteer and paid on call experience. He is the author of two books: Legal Considerations for Fire and Emergency Services, (2006, 2nd ed. 2011, 3rd ed. 2014, 4th ed. 2022) and Fire Officer's Legal Handbook (2007), and is a contributing editor for Firehouse Magazine writing the Fire Law column.
x

Check Also

Court Refuses to Dismiss Due Process Demotion Case

A Wisconsin fire captain who was demoted in 2021 when the city reorganized its promotional process, got a mixed decision in his federal court lawsuit. Richard Haffner claims that Fire Chief Joshua Bell, the City of New Richmond, and the City’s Police and Fire Commission violated his due process rights by removing him as a captain without cause or a hearing.

UK Parliament Questions Fire Service Leader on Institutional Racism Claim

As have many fire departments in the UK and Canada recently, the Dorset and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Authority has been in the news relative to allegations of institutional racism and sexism. However, when questioned by Lee Anderson, a member of parliament, the chair of the Authority, Rebecca Knox, was unable to answer some relatively simple questions about the decision to label her organization “institutionally racist.”